USD value of funds mobilized or catalysed through Innovative finance mechanisms
NEW OR EXISTING KPI
Update an existing KPI
INDICATOR CODE
C2629.MR32.K39
RESPONSIBLE DIVISION
CFO
MR OUTPUT
3.2. Partnerships and resources
PURPOSE
The purpose of this KPI is to measure the total USD value of funds mobilized or catalyzed through innovative finance mechanisms that support WFP’s mandate. By capturing resources generated directly by WFP or indirectly through partnerships, blended finance tools, or catalytic instruments, this KPI tracks WFP’s ability to unlock new financial pathways, diversify its funding base, and leverage innovative financing solutions to scale impact and advance SDG2
CALCULATION FORMULA
Result KPI = ∑ᵢ₌₁ⁿ (USD Value of Funds Mobilizedᵢ) + ∑ⱼ₌₁ᵐ (USD Value of Funds Catalyzedⱼ)
Where:
USD Value of Funds Mobilizedᵢ = funding directly secured through WFP‑led innovative finance mechanisms in the reporting year
USD Value of Funds Catalyzedⱼ = additional funding leveraged for programmes or programme countries through WFP’s role (e.g., blended finance, guarantees, risk‑sharing, outcome‑based models)
n = number of mechanisms that mobilized funds directly.
m = number of mechanisms that catalyzed additional resources
CALCULATION STEPS
Identify eligible innovative finance mechanisms Compile all WFP‑led or WFP‑supported innovative finance mechanisms active during the reporting year (e.g., debt swaps, blended finance tools, guarantees, catalytic models, outcome‑based instruments).
Verify mobilization or catalyzation criteria Confirm which mechanisms mobilized funds directly for WFP and which catalyzed additional resources for programmes or programme countries through WFP’s role
Extract values of funds mobilized For mechanisms generating direct funding to WFP, record the USD value of all contributions received in the reporting year
Determine values of funds catalyzed For mechanisms that leveraged additional resources for programmes or programme countries through WFP’s role, record the USD value of funds committed or deployed by external partners attributable to WFP’s catalytic role
Validate financial documentation Ensure all recorded values are supported by agreements, financial records, or partner confirmations, using standardized definitions of “mobilized” and “catalyzed”
Convert all contributions to USD Apply WFP’s standard exchange rate policies for contributions received or committed in local currency
Calculate totals for each mechanism For each mechanism, calculate the total USD value mobilized and/or catalyzed during the reporting year
Aggregate across mechanisms Sum the USD values of all funds mobilized (n mechanisms) and all funds catalyzed (m mechanisms)
Apply the formula Compute the KPI Value for the reporting year
DATA SOURCE
Data is available from WFP FACTory system and, where required, supplementary CFO offline tracking validated by relevant functional units
DATA COLLECTION METHOD
Data for this KPI is collected from the information consolidated for each innovative finance mechanism during the reporting year. The data collection process follows these steps:
Retrieve available financial information:
Collect annual financial figures for all innovative finance mechanisms recorded in corporate systems and CFO‑maintained tracking tools
Compile mobilized and catalyzed amounts:
For each mechanism, extract the annual values of funds mobilized directly for WFP and funds catalyzed for programmes and programme countries
Review supporting documentation:
Verify that the collected figures are supported by formal documentation such as contribution agreements, partner confirmations, or validated disbursement records
Standardize currency values:
Convert all amounts recorded in non‑USD currencies using WFP’s standard corporate exchange rate policy
Consolidate validated data:
Combine all verified financial figures into a single dataset for the reporting year, ensuring completeness and removal of duplications
AUTOMATION
Partially Automated
BASELINE VALUE
USD 50M
ASSUMPTIONS
Clear and Consistent Definition of “Benefiting COs” A Country Office is considered benefiting when at least one programme has received support from any corporate on‑demand service (logistics, procurement, CBT, administration, infrastructure, digital solutions, or data analytics) within the reporting period
Single Attribution per CO Each CO is counted once in the numerator regardless of the number of programmes supported or the variety/volume of services accessed
Time‑Bound Measurement Only services delivered during the reporting period (annual or quarterly) are counted; previous years’ support is not carried forward
Accurate Logging of On‑Demand Services COs, RBs, and HQ units correctly record all on‑demand requests and deliveries in the relevant corporate systems
Availability and Capacity of Corporate Service Lines HQ and RB units maintain sufficient staffing, expertise, and operational resources to provide on‑demand support upon request
Operational Feasibility at Country Level COs operate in contexts that allow service delivery (minimum security conditions, vendor availability, infrastructure feasibility, access)
Consistent Classification of On‑Demand Services All units apply a shared definition of which solutions qualify as corporate on‑demand services for measurement purposes
Programme‑Driven Service Requests Requests are generated based on programme needs and are linked to strengthening operational delivery
Stable Country Universe The denominator reflects the agreed WFP country presence (COs, LOs, where relevant) for the reporting period
LIMITATIONS
No Measurement of Scale or Value of Support The indicator only reflects whether a CO accessed at least one on‑demand service; it does not capture the dollar value, volume, or frequency of the support provided
Quality, Results and Impact Not Assessed The KPI does not measure the effectiveness, timeliness, operational outcomes, or strategic impact of the services delivered
User Satisfaction Not Captured Programme or CO satisfaction with service quality, responsiveness, or appropriateness is not measured
Programme‑Level Differences Not Reflected A CO is counted as “benefiting” even if only one programme accessed services, which may not represent broader programme needs within that country
Contextual Constraints Affect Comparability Security, access limitations, vendor availability, or infrastructure gaps may restrict service uptake in some COs, affecting comparability across countries
Potential Under‑Reporting Due to System Gaps Incomplete or inconsistent logging of requests across corporate platforms may affect accuracy
Excludes Support Outside Defined Service Lines Informal operational support or assistance that falls outside the recognized service categories is not captured
Risk of Over‑Focusing on Easily Tracked Services Because data on certain corporate services (e.g., logistics, procurement) is more readily available in corporate systems, there is a risk that reporting overemphasizes these areas and under‑represents support that is less systematically recorded