Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://monitoringhandbook.manuals.wfp.org/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

08.MR.KPI - WFP Partners Assessment on PSEA (Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse)

Prev Next

C2629.MR13.K08 - PARTNERS ASSESSMENT ON PSEA

KPI NAME

Percentage of WFP Cooperating Partners registered in the  UN Partner Portal which have been assessed using the UN  Implementing Partner PSEA (protection from sexual exploitation and abuse) Capacity Assessment

NEW OR EXISTING KPI

Update of an existing KPI

INDICATOR CODE

C2629.MR13.K08

RESPONSIBLE DIVISION

ETO

MR OUTPUT

1.3. Risk management

PURPOSE

The purpose of this KPI is to measure the percentage of WFP Cooperating Partners registered in the UN Partner Portal that have completed the UN Implementing Partner PSEA Capacity Assessment. The tool, integrated into the portal in May 2023, provides a common UN approach to vet partners’ PSEA capacities, identify areas for improvement, and share results across agencies to avoid duplication. Monitoring this KPI ensures compliance with the UN Protocol on Allegations of SEA, supports capacity strengthening, and contributes to safer programming and protection of affected communities

An increase in the KPI value indicates more CPs are assessed and moving toward full compliance with PSEA core standards; a decrease signals gaps in assessment coverage and potential need for capacity strengthening

CALCULATION FORMULA

Result KPI = [(∑ WFP CPs selected and assessed through UN IP PSEA capacity assessment)/ (∑ of WFP CPs selected through UN Partner Portal)] X100

CALCULATION STEPS

  1. Compile CP List:

    Prepare a list of all NGOs with which WFP signed Field Level Agreements (FLAs) during the reporting period. Only include NGOs in formal agreement with WFP.

  1. Check UN Partner Portal (UNPP):

    Log into UNPP and search for each CP by name under your country profile.

  2. Access PSEA Module:

    Open the CP’s profile, click the PSEA tab, and review the PSEA module to confirm if the CP has been assessed

  3. Verify Assessment Status:

    An assessed CP is one that has been evaluated against the 8 PSEA core standards and given a preliminary capacity rating by any UN agency

  4. Record in Tracking Sheet:

    If assessed: Record the date, assessing agency, and capacity rating.

    If not assessed: Mark “No” under previous assessment

  5. Apply the formula

DATA SOURCE

Data is available from UN Partner Portal and WFP COMET Database

DATA COLLECTION METHOD

Data for this KPI is collected from the UN Partner Portal (UNPP) and cross-checked against the list of active FLAs from COMET to ensure accuracy

AUTOMATION

N/A

BASELINE VALUE

50%

ASSUMPTIONS

  • Reliable Data and Consistent Definitions: All WFP Cooperating Partners (CPs) with signed FLAs are correctly listed, registered in UNPP, and assessed using the UN IP PSEA Capacity Assessment tool, applying the agreed definition of “assessed” (evaluation against 8 core standards with a preliminary rating)

  • The UN PSEA policy framework, including the 2018 UN Protocol on Allegations of SEA and related standards, remains in force and consistently applied across agencies, ensuring that the UN IP PSEA Capacity Assessment tool is recognized as the common mechanism for partner vetting and capacity strengthening

LIMITATIONS

  • Changing Denominator: The number of WFP contracted CPs fluctuates throughout the reporting period due to varying partnership cycles and context

  • Transition to Online Assessments: Country offices are shifting from offline PSEA assessments to the UNPP PSEA module, so online data may not fully represent all assessments completed

  • Interagency Coordination Gaps: Lack of harmonized implementation among UN agencies could lead to incomplete or delayed assessments, reducing comparability and reliability of data

  • System and Data Dependencies: The KPI relies on timely updates in the UN Partner Portal; delays or inaccuracies in data entry can affect measurement accuracy

  • Data Completeness: Assessment status in UNPP may not be updated promptly, leading to underreporting or inaccurate percentages

  • Manual Verification: Country offices rely on manual checks in UNPP and tracking sheets, increasing risk of human error and inconsistencies

REVIEW FREQUENCY

Annual

QCPR INDICATOR

False

UN COMMON/ COMPLEMENTARY INDICATOR

True

IS THE KPI A UN COMMON OR COMPLEMENTARY INDICATOR

UN Common Indicator

CONTRIBUTING AGENCIES

UNFPA, UNICEF, UNHCR, WHO, UNWOMEN and the UN Secretariat

POINT OF CONTACT

wfp.performanceplanning@wfp.org