90. Percentage of organizations reporting that they are satisfied with services administered and/or managed by WFP | |
VERSION | V1.0 - 2026.03 — NEW |
INDICATOR CODE | 90 |
TECHNICAL OWNER | SCD & TEC |
INDICATOR TYPE | Country Level Outcome Indicator |
INDICATOR CLASSIFICATION | Mandatory |
INDICATOR SCOPE | Programme specific |
APPLICABILITY | The selection of this indicator is mandatory against the following sub-activities in CSP logframes. Selection of the below sub-activities will trigger in COMET the mandatory selection of this indicator:
|
UNIT OF MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS | Unit of measurement: Number of organizations Unit of analysis: Percentage of organizations |
DEFINITION | This indicator measures the satisfaction rate of organizations who have used support services that were administered and/or provided by WFP during the reporting period. Below are some key terminologies for this indicator: Support Services: is work done by WFP to deliver a tangible output (see above Sub-Activity Tags) that enables a government or partner organization to be more efficient and/or effective in their respective areas of work, for example: WFP contracting or operating guest houses, that are used by governments and/or partners to accommodate their personnel; WFP contracting or operating ICT infrastructure, that is used by governments and/or partners to communicate; WFP chartering and/or managing the operations of aircraft, that are used by governments and/or partners to move their personnel and/or cargo; WFP contracting or operating trucks, that are used by governments and/or partners to move their goods. Administered/Provided by: describes all services where WFP is the accountable party vis-à-vis the service user (i.e. the government and/or partner organization), in all eligible cases WFP has either: leased facilities and/or infrastructure, and hired personnel to directly provide the services, or; WFP has sub-contracted a service provider that will be tasked by WFP to deliver the service to a government and/or partner organization. |
RATIONALE | This indicator is required to measure WFPs performance as an administrator/manager and/or provider of services at country level; in line with both Article II section d (i.e. providing services to bilateral donors, UN agencies and NGOs) and Article III (i.e. consulting with, seeking advice from and cooperating with the UN, FAO and other relevant organizations) of the General Regulations approved by the EB in 2025. |
DATA COLLECTION TOOL | Each country office drafts and conducts a feedback survey to be administered to relevant partners. User feedback surveys are conducted, in line with the standards set by the relevant HQ Divisions, for each CSP Activity of the following categories: Mandated Logistics Support, Mandated Telecommunications Support, Aviation Services, and On-demand Services. Where the CSP Activity includes one or more of the applicable Sub-Activities (see above) these surveys must include an appropriate question (see Indicator Calculation for Reporting section below) to solicit feedback on this specific sub-activity. A variety of digital tools are used to collect this feedback, including but not limited to Survey Monkey, Microsoft Forms; records of surveys conducted, and user feedback received must be collected digitally and held per corporate guidance on reporting and record keeping. |
SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS | N/A |
INDICATOR CALCULATION FOR REPORTING | The indicator is calculated as follows: Numerator is the count of all user organizations who have provided “affirmative” feedback on WFP administered and/or provided services at country level during the reporting period. Any organization that has provided “affirmative” feedback during the reporting period will be counted once for the numerator’s numerical value; and, no organization can be counted more than once for the purposes of the numerator’s numerical value.
Denominator is the count of all user organizations who have provided feedback on WFP administered and/or provided services at country level during the reporting period. Any organization that has provided relevant feedback during the reporting period will be counted once for the denominator’s numerical value; and, no organization can be counted more than once for the purposes of the denominator’s numerical value.
NOTE i: in cases where the same organization has provided conflicting feedback – i.e. in one or more complete WFP-initiated user-feedback survey they have indicated that they are “satisfied” with WFP services; and in one more complete WFP-initiated user-feedback survey they have indicated that they are “not satisfied” with WFP services – the organizations aggregate response will be considered affirmative for the purposes of calculating the numerator value where the number of “satisfied” responses exceeds the number of “not satisfied” responses. NOTE ii: neutral and/or indeterminate responses indicating neither “satisfied” or “not satisfied” may count towards the denominator value (where all other criteria are met – i.e. where these responses are part of a complete WFP initiated user-feedback survey) but will not count towards the numerator value. |
DATA ENTRY AND DISAGGREGATION IN CORPORATE SYSTEMS | Values are recorded in the logframe. Each value has a reporting combination which is created based on:
Baseline, target and Follow-up value is reported in the COMET logframe as one overall number. |
BASELINE | Baselines are set only once, per CSP, at the beginning of the relevant activity. Baselines remain fixed for the entire CSP period and are not recalculated annually, unless applicable to an entirely new activity. |
TARGET SETTING | Annual targets: The minimum recommended target is 80%. End of CSP target: Gradually higher than the annual targets established by the CO based on the relevant context. |
FREQUENCY OF DATA COLLECTION | User feedback surveys must be conducted at least once per-year for each CSP Activity of the following categories: Mandated Logistics Support, Mandated Telecommunications Support, On-demand Services. It is also recommended that:
|
INTERPRETATION | This indicator should be considered a ‘health check’ on WFP’s role in administering and/or providing common/shared services at country level; values below 75%, indicating that 1 in 4 organizations are ‘not satisfied’ with WFP in this regard, can be an early sign of difficulties and can assist country offices in identifying underlying causes (e.g. insufficient resourcing, misaligned objectives, a failure to manage expectations, etcetera). |
REPORTING EXAMPLE(S) | N/A |
INDICATORS COLLECTED & ANALYSED AT THE SAME TIME | The following indicators may be reported and analysed along with this indicator: |
COMPLEMENTARY QUALITATIVE RESEARCH | N/A |
DECISIONS DATA CAN INFORM | Low values for this indicator should trigger a more thorough review of services administered and/or provided by WFP (see below Limitations; see above Interpretation). |
VISUALIZATION | N/A |
LIMITATIONS | This indicator is dependent on a subjective measure of satisfaction experienced, or not, by individuals using services administered and/or provided by WFP; as such it can indicate potential issues but is not an objective measure of WFPs performance. Low levels of “satisfaction” may be attributable to external factors; similarly high levels of “satisfaction” may be attributed to unrelated improvements in the operational context. For these reasons other Mandatory Indicators, including objective and subjective measures of efficiency and/or effectiveness gains as well as objective output measures should always accompany this indicator. |
FURTHER INFORMATION | |
90. Percentage of organizations reporting that they are satisfied with services administered and/or managed by WFP
- Updated on May 28, 2026
- Published on May 18, 2026
- 6 minute(s) read