44.MR.KPI - WFP Funds Diversification

C2629.MR32.K44 - Diversification of Funds and Resources

KPI NAME

Diversification: Donor Group Percentage of Total Resources

NEW OR EXISTING KPI

New KPI

INDICATOR CODE

C2629.MR32.K44

RESPONSIBLE DIVISION

PI

MR OUTPUT

3.2. Partnerships and resources

PURPOSE

The purpose of this KPI is to assess WFP’s level of dependence on OECD-DAC governments and measure the degree to which WFP’s resource base is expanding toward a more diversified, resilient, and strategically balanced mix of donor groups. This KPI monitors shifts in financial contributions across all donor categories — including Programme Country Governments, Non OECD-DAC Governments, IFIs, the Private Sector, UN partners, and others — to identify concentration risks, emerging opportunities, and structural vulnerabilities in WFP’s funding profile. By tracking diversification trends over time, the KPI supports strategic decision making in resource mobilization, partnership management, and long-term financial sustainability within the CRF Management Result 3.2

An increase in the diversification percentage may result from growth in contributions from non-OECD-DAC donor groups, a reduction in OECD-DAC contributions, or a combination of both; interpretation of trends should therefore consider absolute resource levels alongside proportional shifts

CALCULATION FORMULA

Result KPI = (Resources from Non-OECD-DAC Donor Groups/Total Resources from All Donor Groups) X 100

Where:

Resources from Non‑OECD‑DAC Donor Groups = Sum of confirmed contributions + on‑demand service provision contract value from: Non‑OECD‑DAC Governments, Programme Country Governments, IFIs, Private Sector, UN Partners, Others Total Resources from All Donor Groups = Sum of confirmed contributions + on‑demand service provision contract value from all seven donor groups, including OECD‑DAC.

CALCULATION STEPS

1. Calculate Total Resources (All Donor Groups)

   Aggregate all confirmed contributions plus on‑demand service provision contract values for the selected reference year across all donor groups (OECD‑DAC and non‑OECD‑DAC combined).

   Total Resources = Σ (Confirmed Contributions + O-D Service Provision Contract Value)

2. Calculate Resources from Non‑OECD‑DAC Donor Groups

   Sum confirmed contributions and on‑demand service provision values for the following donor categories:

   Non‑OECD‑DAC Governments

   Programme Country Governments

   International Financial Institutions (IFIs)

   Private Sector

   United Nations Partners

   Others

   Non‑OECD‑DAC Resources = Σ (All donor groups except OECD‑DAC)

3. Apply the formula

DATA SOURCE

Data is available from WFP WINGS/Grants Management Module

DATA COLLECTION METHOD

Data is updated on daily basis and it is collected from the Grants Management Universe module in Datasphere and hosted in SAP HANA system

AUTOMATION

Automated

BASELINE VALUE

15%

ASSUMPTIONS

• Donor‑group shares are assumed to reflect relative strategic importance

• Two‑year averaging (if applied) smooths anomalies and stabilizes trends.

• Increasing non‑OECD‑DAC and alternative donor contributions is feasible within WFP’s partnership strategy

• “Confirmed contributions” and “service provision contract value” accurately represent total resources

• Donor‑group classifications are applied consistently and without overlap

• Service provision contract values sufficiently reflect total resources delivered, even when delivered in tranches

• IFI contributions are assumed to follow cyclical patterns rather than long‑term decline

• WFP systems (FACTory) can reliably calculate and aggregate the KPI

• Interpretation lenses (Concentration, Trajectory, Stability, Strategic Fit) are meaningful across all donor groups

LIMITATIONS

• Aggregated donor groups mask internal shifts within each group (e.g., changes within OECD‑DAC donors)

• Methodology for on‑demand service provision revenue is not yet fully standardized

• Diversification targets may be aspirational and not always achievable in the short term

• Interpretation framework (Concentration, Trajectory, Stability, Strategic Fit) may not apply equally across all donor groups (e.g., private sector, UN partners)

• High‑value or tranche‑based service contracts create variability in how revenue is recorded

• Donor‑group classification may not always be mutually exclusive or consistently applied across systems

• KPI does not capture qualitative factors (e.g., strategic policy influence, geographic relevance, innovation partnerships)

REVIEW FREQUENCY

Annual

QCPR INDICATOR

False

UN COMMON/ COMPLEMENTARY INDICATOR

False

IS THE KPI A UN COMMON OR COMPLEMENTARY INDICATOR

N/A

IF YES, NAME THE OTHER CONTRIBUTING AGENCIES

N/A

POINT OF CONTACT

wfp.performanceplanning@wfp.org