CC2.b Percentage of country offices that meet community feedback mechanism assurance standards | |
VERSION | V1.0 - 2026.05 NEW |
INDICATOR CODE | CC2.b |
TECHNICAL OWNER | PRG-MF |
INDICATOR TYPE | Corporate Level Cross-cutting Indicator Priority area: Ensuring protection and accountability to affected people |
UNIT OF MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS | Percentage of country offices by category:
|
INDICATOR DEFINITION | This indicator measures the proportion of WFP country offices that meet the community feedback mechanism (CFM) assurance standards. Each country office with Tier 1 beneficiaries needs one CFM that covers all activities. At country level, WFP assesses the country office community feedback mechanism (CFM) against its six global CFM standards, to ensure it is safe and accessible, addresses people’s questions and concerns, and systematically informs WFP’s decision-making. The CFM standards emphasize the importance of accountability, transparency, operational safeguards, risk mitigation, and building trust among the communities WFP serves, donors, and the broader humanitarian network. |
MANDATORY COUNTRY-LEVEL INDICATORS & INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR APR AGGREGATION | Mandatory Country level Indicator(s) composing the corporate indicator:
Inclusion criteria for Mandatory Country Level Indicator(s): The mandatory country level indicator is included in the aggregation of the corporate indicator only if the following conditions are met:
|
CALCULATION & AGGREGATION | To calculate the percentage of WFP country offices that meet the CFM assurance standards: where
Additional calculation should be included for the other three categories (“mostly meets”, “partially meets” and “does not meet”) to capture the extent to which Country Offices meet the CFM assurance standards, repeating the above calculation for each of the following categories:
Note: The four categories may not sum to 100% when there are cases of Country Offices not being able to report on the country level indicator (e.g. “Not collected” data"). |
DISAGGREGATION FOR REPORTING IN APR | This indicator should be disaggregated by category (“Does not meet”, “Partially meets”, “Mostly meets” and “Fully meets”) and regional office. |
BASELINE | New indicator. Baseline to be collected by end of 2026. |
LIMITATIONS | The indicator relies on country office self‑assessments, which may introduce varying degrees of subjectivity depending on staff familiarity with the standards, the availability of supporting documentation, and the extent to which COs interpret and apply the scoring criteria consistently. Additionally, while the indicator measures compliance with procedures, it does not assess the quality, or effectiveness of responses to feedback - including whether CFM action resolves issues, unblocks assistance, or leads to improvements for affected people. To help mitigate these limitations, Global HQ will complement the annual self‑assessment with targeted oversight, which will enhance consistency, strengthen interpretation of standards, and provide an extra layer of quality assurance. |
CC2.b Percentage of country offices that meet community feedback mechanism assurance standards
- Published on May 22, 2026
- 2 minute(s) read